How do I use genuine user content from product seeding with influencers yields more authentic and higher-performing assets for paid media compared to incentivized content from UGC platforms for ecommerce?

Expert answer · sourced from 0 podcast episodes · influencer & creator

Short answer

The biggest mistake is treating all non-brand content as the same. Authentic assets from product seeding come from genuine brand affinity, while paid UGC creators are delivering a service. Using them effectively means understanding that one builds relationships while the other fulfills a specific content brief.

TL;DR

The single biggest mistake brands make is treating all user-submitted content as the same, which blurs the line between authentic UGC and paid-for creative. This leads to misaligned expectations and content that feels forced. The key to using genuine content from product seeding is understanding it’s a different tool, with a different purpose, than the assets you'd get from a UGC platform.

A common pitfall is confusing true user-generated content with content made by hired creators. You might go to a UGC platform looking for the "authenticity" everyone talks about, only to get videos that feel like stiff ad reads. That's because they are. These creators are paid to produce a piece of content, not because they have a deep affinity for your brand. Mark Ritz brought this up on The Bottom Line: Ecommerce Tactics for Profitable Growth, noting that with platform-based content, you have to assume the person was paid. This costs you money on assets that don't perform, because audiences can spot the difference. The fix is to separate your strategies. Product seeding, as Cody Wittick explained on The Unofficial Shopify Podcast, is about using a 'giving, not asking' approach to cultivate influencers who genuinely love the product and become long-term advocates. That's where authenticity comes from.

Another mistake is sending out gifted products without clarifying your content goals or securing usage rights. Many brands are so focused on the "gifting" aspect that they shy away from any formal requests, hoping for the best. This often results in getting content you can’t actually use in paid media, either because it’s the wrong format or, more critically, because you don’t have the legal right to repurpose it. It’s a waste of product and a missed opportunity. As Myran Mahroo pointed out on Honest Ecommerce, you need to negotiate usage rights for the content upfront, even in a gifting relationship. A simple, friendly agreement that outlines how and where you'd love to feature their content protects both you and the creator, ensuring the assets are actually usable.

Finally, some brands swing the pendulum too far and rely only on organic seeding for their creative. They become so obsessed with pure authenticity that they neglect other essential content pipelines that are needed to scale. The reality is that product seeding is powerful but often unpredictable, and it rarely produces the sheer volume of assets needed for a robust paid media strategy. It leaves your ad account without creative diversity. As Kunle Campbell lays out, an efficient marketing mix needs authentic UGC, but also influencer-generated content (IGC) and founder-led branded content. He emphasized that polished, branded video is often crucial for scaling campaigns. The solution is a balanced creative strategy: use product seeding for building brand love and generating top-of-funnel social proof, but lean on platforms and creators for targeted assets at volume when you need to test specific hooks or scale what's working.

Getting this right means seeing content as a system where genuine, seeded content builds your brand's foundation of trust, while other pipelines provide the scalable assets you need to grow.

Ask your own question

Get a personalized answer pulled from 23,800 ecommerce podcast episodes.

Ask a question →

More answers in influencer & creator

Browse all answers →